Deep voice, height, testosterone levels, angular face, finger digit ratio, muscularity: Which male trait best predicts finding a partner and having children?

Degas study of male form. Credit: 
Gift of Dorothy Braude Edinburg to the Harry B. and Bessie K. Braude Memorial Collection
Degas study of male form. Credit: Gift of Dorothy Braude Edinburg to the Harry B. and Bessie K. Braude Memorial Collection
In a massive meta-analysis that was years in the making, psychologists from the University of Durham and the University of St. Andrews in the United Kingdom explored how six masculine traits – a deep voice, height, testosterone levels, facial masculinity, finger digit ratio, and strength/muscularity – impacted men’s mating and reproductive success. One trait was the clear winner…

Muscularity and strength, followed by deep voice, height and testosterone. Credit: Crossley et. al.

The analysis, which combined 96 studies looking at 177,000 subjects from around the world across a wide variety of cultures, was published in February to the journal eLife.

Lead author Dr. Linda Lidbor, whose academic focus is on the traits that influence human mating decisions, and her colleagues found that men who were more muscular and physically stronger reported having more sexual partners. They also fathered more children. Height, testosterone levels, and a deeper voice predicted mating success to a lesser degree, but none of these traits were linked to having more kids. Masculine facial features like a squared jaw and a prominent chin were not associated with increased mating or reproductive success, nor was a masculine finger digit ratio, in which the index finger is relatively shorter than the 4th (ring) finger.

Model Ernest Khalimov. Credit: Sleek’N’Tears

The researchers say the results support the theory that, as humans evolved, males competed with each other for females’ attention, and that women usually chose (or were forced) to mate with the winners.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“In species with male intrasexual competition, males tend to evolve to become larger, stronger, and more formidable than females, as they are in humans,” they wrote.

Dimorphism across species. Credit: Adams et. al.

Though being strong and muscular unquestionably bolsters men’s ability to woo women, it is not the only trait that matters, not even close. Lidbor and her co-authors note that while muscularity’s positive effect on mating success was by far the largest compared to those of all the other examined traits, it was still small overall. Yes, strong, muscular men tend to have more sex and father more children, and this will show up in a large study. But at the individual level, all sorts of other factors like personality, wealth, and style play sizeable roles, not to mention simply being a decent person.

Ross Pomeroy studied Zoology & Biological Aspects of Conversation at University of Wisconsin-Madison and used to be a zookeeper. Ross is now an editor at Real Clear Science. Follow Ross on Twitter @SteRoPo

A version of this article was posted at Real Clear Science and is used here with permission. Check out Real Clear Science on Twitter @RCScience

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-12_21_03-PM
Viewpoint: Is there new evidence that the animal deworming drug ivermectin decreases the risk of Covid and cancer? Don’t waste your money.
leeteam
How Kennedy and his family could pocket millions from Merck’s $50 million vaccine injury settlement that he oversaw
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-3.07.42-PM
Controversy over WNBA star Sophie Cunningham’s comment opposing trans females in women’s sports reinvigorates the culture wars
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.09.25-PM
Anti-vaccine myths rattle health care
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-2.30.35-PM
Climate scientists claim conservative activists are promoting ‘lies’ that Europe’s summer heatwaves are far from unusual
Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 05_50_04 PM
Fear, science, and the law: If talc powder is unlikely to cause cancer and J&J was winning in court, why did it pay more than $5.5 billion to settle?
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 12_05_21 PM
AI-generated physicians promoting bogus cures and worthless supplements surge on social media
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 06_26_01 PM 2
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food myths make a comeback on Instagram, with Dr. Kevin Folta
ChatGPT Image Jul 29, 2026, 10_14_27 PM
After muzzling RFK, Jr. over autism-vaccine conspiracy theories, Trump defies aides to push scares again
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 1.38
Viewpoint: Are the U.S. and Europe headed towards a repudiation of agricultural biotechnology red tape?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.