Moving from off-the-shelf cancer vaccines to shots personalized to your genetic makeup

Credit: Getty Images
Credit: Getty Images

In recent years, we have seen great advances in disease diagnosis through biomarkers and, increasingly, gene sequencing.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

This progress has resulted in the development of a number of successful immuno-oncology approaches to cancer therapy such as checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell–based products. We are also seeing the development of cancer vaccines, which aim to train the immune system to target tumor-specific antigens.

Although off-the-shelf vaccines are easier to manufacture, they require the incorporation of many irrelevant epitopes, potentially compromising efficacy. Also, they may benefit only selected patients. In contrast, personalized vaccines are potentially applicable across tumor types and for all patient populations. However, they can be difficult and costly to develop and manufacture.

The personalized approach is built around increasing sequencing capabilities and the use of algorithms to predict multiple MHC class I epitopes specific to an individual patient’s tumor. Then it is necessary to manufacture vaccines that are, essentially, targeted to an individual patient’s tumor. Doing so requires an extra degree of precision.

Despite these challenges, several companies, such as Roche/Genentech, Evaxion Biotech, EpiVax, and Geneos Therapeutics, have products that are in clinical trials or have already completed clinical trials.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The Orange Bowl without oranges: Can CRISPR save Florida citrus?
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 11.31
‘Realistic and durable’: EPA proposes loosening restrictions on some PFAS ‘forever chemicals.’
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 12_06_53 PM
Fake Ebola cure promoters already cashing in as disinformation videos flood social media
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT Image May 24, 2026, 03_16_36 PM
Here come the biohackers' Enhanced Games—The Olympics for athletes doping up on steroids, hormones and peptides. What’s wrong with that?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.