10-year CRISPR anniversary: How gene editing revolutionized medicine, and what lies ahead

Gene editing using CRISPR tech
Credit: Wired

Ten years ago, a little-known Science paper authored by Jennifer Doudna, Ph.D., and Emmanuelle Charpentier, Ph.D., proposed using CRISPR/Cas9 for gene editing. As the first wave of gene-editing-based therapies post clinical data and head to the FDA, biopharma executives at the forefront of the burgeoning field highlighted the innovations and challenges before gene editing is ready for prime time.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Now, some of the early efforts of turning CRISPR gene editing technology into viable therapies are coming to fruition. Vertex and partner CRISPR Therapeutics just announced their plan to file their CRISPR/Cas9-edited cell therapy exagamglogene autotemcel (exa-cel) for a rolling review at the FDA in sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia starting in November. If approved, exa-cel could be the first CRISPR-based therapy available.

Meanwhile, Intellia Therapeutics, after being the first to show that systemic infusion of CRISPR inside the human body could treat disease, recently reported more positive early data for its in vivo gene editing candidates for transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) and hereditary angioedema.

For now, most gene editing projects are focused on rare diseases and some blood or cancer indications with well-established genetic drivers. Those diseases have clear clinical endpoints and risk-benefit understanding to allow for a quick drug development path.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.