Viewpoint: Can we trust corporate ‘regenerative farming’ pledges?

Credit: GreenNews
Credit: GreenNews

People latch onto words and then casually throw them around like they know what it means. The most common — and obvious — is the line that “organic farmers don’t use pesticides.” Well, Karen, actually…

Most often this happens with the latest, trendiest fads. Whether most people know it, those fads are usually picked up by marketing companies, who develop entire campaigns around them. That’s how I end up with emails from random companies eager to share their commitment to whatever trend.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The marketer again told me all the right stuff. Regenerative agriculture means farmers are economically viable and able to invest in soil health, clean water, and strong ecosystems. That reaching a goal like that means farms will look different depending on climates, soils, and other factors. And that the company would consult with crop specialists with expertise in the local areas where their wheat is grown.

Those are all fantastic things! It’s what I’ve said as an agriculture writer over the last decade! But it completely misses the point: Farmers are already doing this stuff without a fancy label or neat certification. Farmers want to use the best practices that will sustain their farm over the long term, both environmentally and economically. It’s just good business.

But this is what people want to hear: We’re sourcing all of our wheat from farmers that use regenerative practices! Why? Because of the almighty virtue signaling!

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-05-04-at-12.54.32-PM
How Utah became the country’s supplement capital  — and a haven for unregulated, ineffective and fake products
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
bigstock opioids on chalkboard with rol
GLP podcast: 'Safe injection sites': enabling drug addiction or saving lives?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.