Viewpoint: MIT turns blind eye to misinformation on agricultural biotechnology and vaccines promoted by ‘infamous crank’ computer scientist Stephanie Seneff

Credit: Fox News
Credit: Fox News

How long before academics who spout anti-vaccine nonsense related to COVID-19 get a level of accountability academics who spouted anti-vaccine nonsense for 25 years prior to that never had? What about conspiracy theories regarding food, where academics like Walter Willett and Stephanie Seneff rampage against science, including libel, with no concern at all from their schools?

Writing at Genetic Literacy Project in 2022, Professor Kevin Folta, no stranger to being targeted by anti-science activists, makes the arbitrary nature of academic freedom look even more capricious, by noting that famed crank Seneff runs amok through facts and reason about one aspect of biology without concern while University of Auckland scholar Dr. Siouxsie Wiles was told to keep quiet about another.

Hate GMOs? MIT says it’s academic freedom. Defend vaccines? Get told to exit social media and go on forced paid leave.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

MIT remains a puzzle for allowing Seneff to claim she is an “MIT Senior Research Scientist” bleating corporate conspiracy fables about agriculture and vaccines when she is only a programmer who works on ‘communication’ between humans and computers. She hasn’t gotten the memo that the anti-science left who have routinely feted her has pivoted to being pro-vaccine, at least publicly.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claims? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
Screenshot-2026-02-20-at-10.48.04-AM
Deepfakes raise profound ethical questions in science
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-3.40.33-PM
Seeds of power: China turns to genetic engineering to become global superpower
ChatGPT-Image-May-13-2026-11_56_08-AM
After slashing global health aid by $19 Billion, Trump moves to tap $2.1 billion more—to cover shutdown costs
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-01_41_42-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Measles is a canary in the healthcare coal mine’: Challenging RFK, Jr.’s scare campaign
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.