Viewpoint: Grim consequences of Greenpeace’s war on biotechnology — Blindness, hunger, and suffering children

Credit: Roberta F. via CC-BY-SA-3.0
Credit: Roberta F. via CC-BY-SA-3.0

A genetically modified rice variety could save the lives of thousands of children. But now Greenpeace has prevented the sowing because of alleged health risks. Typical: The eco-activists care neither about science nor about the common good. Your agenda is completely different.

“This rice could save the lives of millions of children every year,” said the American news magazine “Time” jubilantly 23 years ago about the successful production of golden rice. Using genetic engineering, biochemists had succeeded in developing the rice variety with increased amounts of a vitamin A precursor. Hundreds of thousands of children go blind every year from vitamin A deficiency, about half of them die. Golden rice could prevent misery.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

But the project is faltering because Greenpeace and other so-called environmental organizations are torpedoing the Golden Rice with lawsuits in court over alleged risks of the genetically modified seeds – despite criticism from experts. A study in the journal “Environment and Development Economics” nine years ago came to the conclusion that delaying the use of golden rice could have cost one and a half million years of life unnecessarily even then.

[Editor’s note: This article was originally published in German and has been translated and edited for clarity.]

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Supplement Rain Wellness Illustration
Viewpoint: Bedeviled by “toxic inflammation”? How wellness grifters turn this scientific gray zone into a supplement jackpot
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Teal Hexagon Technology Icons
4 key ways the Blue Wave will upend science policy
Confident Doctor in Clinical Setting
More than 80% of ‘pro-science’ candidates were swept into office. Will they have a policy impact?
Stacked Protest Signs on Concrete Ledge
Voters hate AI data centers, yet they are crucial to establishing a critical technology. So what’s next?
Protect-Womens-Sports-at-the-Capitol
Blue, purple and red states passed or reaffirmed bans on trans females competing in women’s sports
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
Screenshot-2026-11-05-at-1.20.54-PM
$7.35 billion PFAS settlement: 3M to pay people who blame health problems on ‘forever chemicals’ phased out of firefighting foam for more than 20 years
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.