Viewpoint: ‘Biotech and organic can exist side by side’ — Professors and scientists support New Zealand’s potential gene-editing turnabout

Credit: Krzysztof Golik
Credit: Krzysztof Golik

Decades on from mass public protests, a royal commission, midnight raids on crop trials, potential lab leaks and the infamous Corngate scandal, some scientists are welcoming a push from the National Party to relax regulations on genetic modification.

The party released policy on [June 11] saying it would reverse the ban and introduce a new biotech regulator, if elected in October.

University of Auckland biological sciences Professor Andrew Allan said he hoped the revival of public discussion on the issue would lead to a “science-based decision, not a knee-jerk emotional response”, regardless of who won the election.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

[Allan] did not think contamination was inevitable, pointing to the co-existence of “a massive organic sector and a massive GM sector” in North America.

Genetically modified food accounted for 15% of world agricultural value, and came into New Zealand in processed food, “but we’ve captured none of the value we could have had from it”, he said.

He dismissed concerns about hurting New Zealand’s “clean green image”, saying there was “no evidence” Australia’s image as an exporter of very good wine was damaged by the fact it allowed gene editing in the field.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
Screenshot-2026-05-20-at-5.11.17-PM
Viewpoint: No, sugar doesn’t ‘feed’ cancer — common cancer myths, debunked

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.