Viewpoint: Using selective chemistry — Burdensome EU regulations prevent introduction of lower-impact agricultural pest control products

leaves rain mte lk dna
Credit: StockSnap.io (Public Domain)

The EU has outlined its ambition to slash in half the use and risk of chemical pesticides in its flagship food policy, the Farm to Fork strategy, by 2030.

The move has proven controversial, with stakeholders questioning both the direction of travel and whether farmers had the tools to get there.

But for Linda Field, a leading insect molecular biologist and professor emerita at Rothamsted, the longest-running agricultural research institute in the world, such targets can sometimes be a ‘good thing’ because “it galvanises things into action”.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Despite this potential, alternative pest control methods “aren’t really coming through and they’re getting stuck in research labs”, she said.

“There’s all this pest control for free out there, and we’re not using it properly for farmers,” she said, lamenting the fact that there’s “a lot in the research pipeline, but it’s not getting out of the pipeline”.

But while the technology [for example RNA interference] has demonstrable potential, it has been ‘temporarily dropped’ by many companies which “initially showed quite a lot of interest” – something Cook puts down to maladapted regulation unable to cope with new innovations.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.