Scammy food allergy test? Why the most prominent US allergy association recommends against relying on popular IgG serological panels

igg vs ige antibody testing
Credit: Everlywell

A test that claims to be able to diagnose food sensitivities and is commonly available is the food IgG test.

It is important to understand that this test has never been scientifically proven to be able to accomplish what it reports to do. The scientific studies that are provided to support the use of this test are often out of date, in non-reputable journals and many have not even used the IgG test in question. The presence of IgG is likely a normal response of the immune system to exposure to food. In fact, higher levels of IgG4 to foods may simply be associated with tolerance to those foods.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Due to the lack of evidence to support its use, many organizations, including theย American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunologyย and theย Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology have recommended against using IgG testing to diagnose food allergies or food intolerances/sensitivities.

It is understandably frustrating while looking for ways (especially natural, non-medicinal ways) to feel better, but patients need to know if the advice they are following is based on tests that have been proven or on tests that are controversial and have not been proven.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of โ€œprocessโ€: What science says about the โ€œdangersโ€™ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
Screenshot-2026-04-29-at-11.31.42-AM
Dad brains: Only women undergo bodily changes during and after childbirth? Think again.
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin Dย 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-3-2026-01_17_14-PM
MAHA wellness influencers deride proven anxiety medications, tout lifestyle fixes
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Fish oil supplements for brain injuries probably donโ€™t workย 
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your healthย 
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-28-2026-12_46_14-PM-2
Kennedy has quietly stopped touting problematic raw milk. Health concerns arenโ€™t why
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-29-2026-11_04_44-AM-2
Anti-vaccine activists are now the majority in RFK, Jr.โ€™s CDC Vaccine Panel
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_57_31-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Science-as-Satanโ€™ unites the MAHAโ€”MAGA movements. Is a breakup in the works?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.