Climate change agriculture: GM crops, no-till farming and judicious use of glyphosate and other herbicides help address disruptions, Canadian study finds

no till farming min
Credit: GeoPard Agriculture

Ever since the first commercialization of genetically modified (GM) crops in the mid-1990s, researchers have considered the impact of these new technologies on the economic and ecological footprint of farming. Nearly 25 years of peer-reviewed research of commercialized GM crops in adopting countries establishes that they contribute to yield increases and overall reduce chemical inputs. The result is that GM crops produce higher global farm incomes and the concomitant changes in land management practices and reductions in chemical use have delivered substantial environmental benefits. As the body of evidence grows, linkages can be established between the adoption of GM crops and their contributions to mitigating climate change.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Prior to herbicide tolerant crops, efficient in-crop weed control options were limited, resulting in farmers predominantly relying on the use of summerfallow for effective weed control. In dryland agricultural production, summerfallow practices resulted in significant soil erosion and loss, as well as reduced moisture conservation. GMHT crops drove the transition from the use of tillage as the lead form of weed control, to continuous, zero tillage land management practices.

The article additionally estimates that the reduction in tillage practices and adoption of zero tillage has resulted in an extra 5.6 billion kg of carbon being sequestered in 2018, which is equivalent to 20.6 billion kg of CO2 not being released into the global atmosphere. These savings are equivalent to taking 13.6 million cars off the road for one year. Since 1996, an estimated 302 billion kg of CO2 has been sequestered as soil carbon.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.