Should marijuana be reclassified by the government as less dangerous than heroin?

Credit: Leafwell
Credit: Leafwell

As hasĀ been reported, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) is planning to move cannabis (marijuana) from Schedule I to Schedule III at the federal level.

While many details of the proposal and plans are still missing, the move followsĀ directives from President BidenĀ in 2022 to review federal cannabis policy with the stated goal of ending criminal penalties for possession — whichĀ disproportionately affect people of color and other minoritized groups.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

This change in scheduling would recognize medical use of cannabis at the federal level, catching up to the fact thatĀ millions of Americansopens in a new tab or window currently use marijuana. This change would also acknowledge that it has less risk for misuse and problems than other drugs like heroin, bringing policy closer to both scientific and popular consensus.

This change would not recognize nonmedical (e.g. recreational) use as legal. Even possession without a prescription would still be subject to criminal and civil penalties, including potential for prison time.

If the president’s goal for this change is truly to end criminal penalties for simple cannabis possession, he should be informed that changing it from Schedule I to Schedule III will not accomplish this. This reclassification would not free anybody currently incarcerated on cannabis-related charges, and will not expunge criminal records. Furthermore, experts are speculating that DEA will attempt to tighten the loopholes allowing the sale of hemp-related compounds, which would prohibit many currently available cannabis products and significantly reduce access to nonmedical cannabis products.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.09.25-PM
Anti-vaccine myths rattle health care
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointā€”ā€œMiracle moleculeā€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Picture1
Hiroshima at 81: America’s new nuclear bomb, a buried Iranian target, and a question no one wants to ask
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-12_21_03-PM
Viewpoint: Is there new evidence that the animal deworming drug ivermectin decreases the risk of Covid and cancer? Don’t waste your money.
leeteam
How Kennedy and his family could pocket millions from Merck’s $50 million vaccine injury settlement that he oversaw
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-3.07.42-PM
Controversy over WNBA star Sophie Cunningham’s comment opposing trans females in women’s sports reinvigorates the culture wars
Screenshot-2026-07-30-at-2.30.35-PM
Climate scientists claim conservative activists are promoting ā€˜lies’ that Europe’s summer heatwaves are far from unusual

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.