If the world sees significant increases in hunger in the coming years, it won’t be driven by global warming but “bad science communication and fear mongering.” That’s the thesis of a provocative but science-based analysis by Breakthrough Institute scholar Alex Smith. We know how to continue enhancing sustainable food production, Smith argues, but that fact might prove irrelevant if a cohort of “activist researchers,” “long-standing critics of industrial food production” and journalists get their way.
These voices advocate for a mass transition to regenerative agriculture–the latest marketing term for organic farming–in the name of slowing climate change. But with a yield penalty somewhere around 20 percent, so-called regenerative farming simply can’t produce all the calories we need to feed 10 billion people. That task must be left to high-efficiency conventional agriculture.
Why does widespread support for organic farming persist despite its well-documented limitations? Join hosts Dr. Liza Dunn and GLP contributor Cameron English on episode 284 of Science Facts and Fallacies as they break down this critically important story:
Podcast:
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Subscribe: RSS
Dr. Liza Dunn is a medical toxicologist and the medical affairs lead at Bayer Crop Science. Follow her on X @DrLizaMD
Cameron J. English is the director of bio-sciences at the American Council on Science and Health. Visit his website and follow him on X @camjenglish

























