Longevity expert says tinkering with the aging process won’t help you live longer

Credit: UCLA
Credit: UCLA

“We don’t have an ageing intervention yet,” says [Dr Stuart Jay Olshansky]

The only way humans are going to live longer, Olshansky says, is if we discover a way to slow the ageing process. In finding new ways to combat disease, we have simply extended a person’s potential final act.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“In the 20th century, we manufactured an additional 30 years of life, on average, for populations,” he explains. “Back then, life expectancy was close to 50. Today, it’s closer to 80… We need to be enormously grateful for what public health and medicine has given us, because most of us alive today over the age of 60 are living on time that was manufactured for us by medicine and public health.”

[W]e have essentially been playing “a game of whack-a-mole” with fatal diseases, he says. We must address “the ageing of cells, tissues, organs and organ systems that accumulate damage just by living, by breathing, by eating, by oxidising”. He argues – as he always has – that if we don’t find a way to truly slow ageing, then no matter what biohackers might claim (with extreme diets and sleep regimes), human lifespans will plateau.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.