Viewpoint: If 23andMe has your DNA, don’t panic, your privacy is not in danger

Credit: Creative Commons
Credit: Creative Commons

As word spread last year that 23andMe was about to go bankrupt, many of their millions of customers wondered if they should delete their data. Social and conventional media were quick to offer advice ….

Despite the near-hysterical warnings from the WashPost and other sources, 23andMe doesn’t have “your DNA.” Your genome (which contains all your DNA) has 23 pairs of chromosomes … and all together they add up to about 3.1 billion letters (nucleotides) of DNA. It might be cool if 23andMe had all that, but they don’t!

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Instead, when you spit into a tube and send it to 23andMe, they run what’s called a DNA “chip” on your sample. This chip identifies less than a million individual nucleotides scattered around the genome (about 640,000, actually) … So no, they don’t have your genome, but they do have a small sample of it.

The privacy concern about DNA is that (according to some) it’s information that you can’t change. True enough–but plenty of other private information is just as permanent, or nearly so, and you’ve already shared that far more than you might realize.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 1.38
Viewpoint: Are the U.S. and Europe headed towards a repudiation of agricultural biotechnology red tape?
Screenshot-2026-07-27-at-3.23.14-PM
Prioritizing AI, robotics, and nuclear energy: Trump administration is guiding research funding away from independent universities to private companies
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-11_51_01-AM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s depressingly misguided (and litigator-funded) crusade against antidepressants
png-terrace-Farm-asia
Europe’s tentative embrace of agricultural gene editing could revolutionize food production and health in Asia
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-26-2026-05_35_53-PM
FDA takes up peptide therapies as hype outpaces science
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-26-2026-05_58_17-PM
Louisiana and Texas bring RFK,Jr.- MAHA-backed restrictions on dyes and other ‘controversial’ ingredients to eight states
Screenshot 2026-07-27 at 6.15
No test, no tennis: Women’s Tennis Association becomes first major female sports league to require genetic sex testing
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-09_42_12-AM-1
Peptides, patient autonomy, and the limits of medical freedom
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-11_33_49-AM
Viewpoint: High-dose resveratrol supplements to extend health and life? Don’t waste your money.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.