Viewpoint: If 23andMe has your DNA, don’t panic, your privacy is not in danger

Credit: Creative Commons
Credit: Creative Commons

As word spread last year that 23andMe was about to go bankrupt, many of their millions of customers wondered if they should delete their data. Social and conventional media were quick to offer advice ….

Despite the near-hysterical warnings from the WashPost and other sources, 23andMe doesn’t have “your DNA.” Your genome (which contains all your DNA) has 23 pairs of chromosomes … and all together they add up to about 3.1 billion letters (nucleotides) of DNA. It might be cool if 23andMe had all that, but they don’t!

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Instead, when you spit into a tube and send it to 23andMe, they run what’s called a DNA “chip” on your sample. This chip identifies less than a million individual nucleotides scattered around the genome (about 640,000, actually) … So no, they don’t have your genome, but they do have a small sample of it.

The privacy concern about DNA is that (according to some) it’s information that you can’t change. True enough–but plenty of other private information is just as permanent, or nearly so, and you’ve already shared that far more than you might realize.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-10_17_15-AM
Viewpoint: Why are the less intelligent more likely to be conservative—and smarter people more socially liberal?
Screenshot-2026-08-12-at-11.31.46-AM
AI is helping develop new vaccines
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-10.24.54-AM
Viewpoint: Dubious environmental fears: Why the AI buildout is critical to America’s ecological future
Screenshot-2026-09-16-at-12.07.47-PM
The heated debate over trans athletes in the WNBA
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-9-2026-02_48_24-PM
Viewpoint: Trump-RFK Jr. report on “Gender Ideology & Left-wing Ideology’ targets LGBTQ community—and science
Screenshot 2026-09-11 at 12.39
Child-monitoring apps: When the cure is worse than the harm—and how the technology could be tweaked
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-11.50.46-AM
Did COVID vaccines kill 2,500 service members? RFK Jr. hires an investigator who compares vaccine promoters to Nazi doctors
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.