More than 12,500 pesticides need assessment or re-evaluation. Here is how EPA does its work

epa smog
Credit: Pxhere (Public Domain)
Environmental Protection Agency head Lee Zeldin has said he wants the federal agency toย accelerate scientific safety evaluations of various chemicals, including pesticides.

The EPA reportedly hasย more than 500 pending reviewsย of proposed new pesticides and more than 12,000 overdue reevaluations of pesticides currently in use. The agency is under pressure from theย chemical and agricultural industriesย to catch up, while health and environmental advocates demand itย maintain high safety standards.

The review process is careful for a reason โ€“ and perhaps the only real method of speeding it up is the one Zeldin has proposed:ย reassigning staffย so there areย more people to share the work.

As a faculty member at a land-grant university who has studied theย effectiveness of commercial and experimental pesticidesย in the southern U.S., I have seen how theย federal pesticide regulatory processย identifies risks to humans and the environment and mitigates them with specific use instructions. Hereโ€™s how the process works.

First, what is a pesticide?

The EPA, which regulates pesticides in the U.S., defines aย pesticide as any substance or mixture of substancesย intended to prevent, destroy, repel or mitigate any pest, such as weeds, insects and organisms, that attack plants.

Pesticides are often referred to as toxins when found in food, water bodies or other places where they are not intended. But just because something is detected doesnโ€™t mean itโ€™s harmful to humans or wildlife. Toxicity depends onย how much of the substance a person or animal is exposed to, how they are exposed to it โ€“ such as breathing it, or getting it on their skin โ€“ and for how long.

The Department of Agriculture began regulating pesticides in 1947 with the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Most of the departmentโ€™s interest was whether a particular pesticide was effective against the target pests.

In 1970, the newly formed EPA took over responsibility for pesticides. Itย shifted its focus to the safetyย of consumers, farmworkers and the environment after the Federal Environmental Pesticide Control Act took effect in 1972.

A rack of shelves holds many different containers of various products advertised as pesticides.
A wide range of pesticides are available to consumers for use in their homes and yards.ย Jeffrey Greenberg/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

Risk-benefit analysis

Federal law requires the EPA toย evaluate both the risks and the benefitsย of each pesticide โ€“ and to revisit that analysisย at least every 15 yearsย for every pesticide used in the U.S.

The EPA determines whether the risks to people, animals or the environment are too high for the benefits the pesticide provides and whether any of those risks can be reduced. Sometimes a chemicalโ€™s risk can be lessened byย recommending mitigation strategiesย such as wearing protective clothing, reducing environmental spread by barring the use of pesticides near the edges of a property, or decreasing the amount of a pesticide thatโ€™s legal to use.

In its analysis of any given pesticide, the EPA requires a massive amount of data from the manufacturer about whatย ingredients the pesticide contains and how they work. The agency also reviews scientific research on the pesticide and usesย its own scientists and independent expertsย to evaluate any studies that were submitted by the manufacturer.

The EPA uses all the available data on a pesticide to evaluate the dose that would be toxic to a range of organisms, as well as what residues the pesticide may leave on plants, in the soil and in water. The data is incorporated intoย computer modelsย that estimate the potential amount of the chemical that may come in contact with humans, animals and the environment. Those modelsโ€™ results are then combined withย toxicity dataย to determine risk.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The models used by EPA scientists are very conservative. They often useย significant overestimates of exposure, which means that when the models determine the risk of a pesticide is below a particular level, they are evaluating the risk posed by far higher quantities of the chemical than will ever actually be used. The risk from the amount actually used, therefore, is even less likely to cause harm.

The EPA also providesย opportunities for public comment on a pesticideย and uses that information in its evaluations as well.

A tractor moves through a field, spraying mist behind it.
Pesticides are commonly used in commercial agriculture.ย Charlie Neibergall/AP

Additional scrutiny

The Endangered Species Act also requires the EPA to evaluate the effects ofย pesticides on threatened and endangered species.

If a pesticide is found to potentially be dangerous to a protected species or its habitat, theย EPA will discuss those findingsย with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service, which enforce the Endangered Species Act, and determine what to do to ensure the species arenโ€™t harmed.

The lawโ€™s requirement to reevaluate each pesticide every 15 years is based on the fact that science evolves and information becomes more precise. New data can shed light on potential risks and benefits, and even lead toย pesticides being banned or more closely restricted.

Until recently, for instance, pesticide residues on plants, food and in the environment were measured in parts per million. Newer equipment can measure even smaller amounts, determining parts per billion, which is as precise as identifyingย one single second in 32 years. Some chemicals can even be measured in parts per trillion, equivalent toย one drop of water in 20 Olympic-size swimming pools. That means exposures can be more accurately measured. While some chemicals can be toxic in very small concentrations, most pesticides can be detected at levels that do not pose a biological risk.

Allowing a pesticide to be used

If the EPA determines that a pesticideโ€™s risks outweigh its benefits, then its staff will conduct additional analyses to determine how to mitigate the risks enough to justify using it. If thatโ€™s not possible, the EPA willย reject the applicationย and not allow the pesticide to be used in the U.S.

If the agency determines that the benefits outweigh the risks, the EPA approves the pesticide for sale and use in the U.S. The law requires theย pesticide come with a labelย providing a strict set of guidelines for how, when and where to use the pesticide.

The guidelines define amounts and timing for applying the pesticide safely, and specific restrictions or protection strategies to control the target pests while eliminating or minimizing harm to the environment, workers and the public.

The EPA also makes information onย pesticides available to the public, so anyone can find out how to use them safely. Using theย pesticide without following those directionsย is a violation of federal law.

Dr. Jeff Gore is Professor and Head of Mississippi State University. He received his B.S. degree from Auburn University and his M.S. and Ph.D. from Louisiana State University, all in Entomology. 

A version of this article was originally posted atย Conversationย and has been reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit the original author and provide links to both the GLP and the original article. Find Conversation on Xย @Conversation_US

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.โ€™s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-3.40.33-PM
Seeds of power: China turns to genetic engineering to become global superpower
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challengingย 
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
Screenshot 2026-05-08 at 3.01
Transforming farming and nutrition with AI and robotics? Larry Ellisonโ€™s half-billion-dollar Hawaii greenhouse dream goes bust
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformationโ€”about farming
ChatGPT-Image-May-8-2026-01_41_33-PM-3
Viewpoint: Surge of climate misinformation traced to right wing and anti-wind activistsย 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDAโ€™s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.