The free-range chicken dilemma: Better for birds, but with substantial costs

In the 2021 study, researchers looked at organic and free-range farms, which offered birds more space to roam and raised slower-growing breeds as compared to factory farm chickens.

…

To be precise, the study found that a national switch to higher welfare chicken (slow growing, on pasture) would require up to 60% more land. The researchers describe this potential switch as “untenable” — it would only work if per capita chicken consumption decreased by 37%.

In 2023, per capita chicken consumption in the U.S. was 100 lbs by 2023. Dropping that by 37% would equate to around 63 lbs of chicken per year, or about as much chicken that was being consumed in the early nineties. In other words, this would mean a huge change in the way Americans eat.

Related on the SLP

Viewpoint: Why Washington should sharply increase funding for intensive agricultural to address climate change, spur sustainability Whole Foods embraces slow-growing chickens: Why that’s not so environmentally sustainable

Convinced COVID shots cause widespread harm, Kennedy plans federal initiative to incentivize doctors to report alleged injuries

Should we be afraid of our food?

5 deaths, 1,000 reported cases: These horrific numbers underestimate the consequences of the anti-vax movement

There are environmental tradeoffs however, that come with slower growing breeds and more space. In order to have more land, for the chickens to roam and to grow food for them, farmers will have to expand, which comes with deforestation, the process of destroying uncultivated habitats to create something else, in this case, farms.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here