A new therapy has been developed that promoters claim can remove microplastics from the body. Is it safe? Does it work?

Credit: Public Domain
Credit: Public Domain

There is mounting evidence that microplastics and “forever chemicals” are infiltrating human bodies and endangering people’s health.

Interventions to remove those plastics run the gamut, including ones with little published evidence that they are effective in people. Colorado-based Winnow is selling a probiotic for $50 that the company says can “stick” to microplastics ….

Elora Therapeutics … is building an injectable drug containing enzymes that can break down plastic polymers and microplastics in the body.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Perhaps no approach has stirred more buzz than a costly treatment known as apheresis, which involves using machines to remove tiny particles and chemicals from plasma.

A machine draws blood from patients and spins it in a centrifuge to separate red blood cells from the plasma. The plasma is run through a column to filter out microplastics and absorb other toxins, then reinjected into the patient. The entire process takes about two to three hours and costs around $13,000 ….

Some scientists … are enthusiastic about apheresis for increasing longevity or treating chronic illnesses. But they question how effective the treatment is for microplastics.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-01_14_50-PM
Viewpoint: Disinformation grift: The wellness industry is a lucrative and mostly worthless marketplace of ‘balms, brews, and baloney’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-01_09_47-PM
Viewpoint: As MAHA blows up over Supreme Court ruling limiting glyphosate litigation, Trump offers toothless plan to reduce pesticides in food
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-12_19_35-PM
Ideological red flag: Led by anti-vax doctor, Tennessee is now the U.S. epicenter selling potent ivermectin shown worthless to prevent or treat Covid
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.