Viewpoint: South Korea’s outdated crop gene editing regulations stifles agricultural production 

Credit: Choi Su-jin’s People Power Party office
Credit: Choi Su-jin’s People Power Party office

At a policy seminar where Korea’s science community, agriculture sector and government gathered to discuss regulatory reforms for gene editing (GEO) technology, participants repeatedly said that “Korea has technological competitiveness but lags major countries in the speed of commercialization.”

[Ko Sang-eok, a pig specialist veterinarian,] cited the world’s first pig resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) as an example, saying, “The United States has approved the commercialization of the pig, and major countries in Europe and Asia are also expected to approve it,” and added, “Even if Korea starts now, it will inevitably be at least 10 years behind.”

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The situation is similar in crops. Choi Seong-hwa, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Seoul National University, explained that vitamin D-fortified tomatoes being co-developed with Bayer are expected to be sold worldwide in 2028, but Korea classifies GEO as GMO, so both domestic cultivation and sales are banned.

Professor Choi urged regulatory improvements, saying that if the GEO industry opens, a market worth tens of trillions of won will emerge in food and essential goods. He added, “The biggest victims right now are farmers” ….

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The Orange Bowl without oranges: Can CRISPR save Florida citrus?
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 11.31
‘Realistic and durable’: EPA proposes loosening restrictions on some PFAS ‘forever chemicals.’
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 12_06_53 PM
Fake Ebola cure promoters already cashing in as disinformation videos flood social media
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT Image May 24, 2026, 03_16_36 PM
Here come the biohackers' Enhanced Games—The Olympics for athletes doping up on steroids, hormones and peptides. What’s wrong with that?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.