Viewpoint: South Korea’s outdated crop gene editing regulations stifles agricultural production 

Credit: Choi Su-jin’s People Power Party office
Credit: Choi Su-jin’s People Power Party office

At a policy seminar where Korea’s science community, agriculture sector and government gathered to discuss regulatory reforms for gene editing (GEO) technology, participants repeatedly said that “Korea has technological competitiveness but lags major countries in the speed of commercialization.”

[Ko Sang-eok, a pig specialist veterinarian,] cited the world’s first pig resistant to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) as an example, saying, “The United States has approved the commercialization of the pig, and major countries in Europe and Asia are also expected to approve it,” and added, “Even if Korea starts now, it will inevitably be at least 10 years behind.”

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The situation is similar in crops. Choi Seong-hwa, a professor in the Department of Biological Sciences at Seoul National University, explained that vitamin D-fortified tomatoes being co-developed with Bayer are expected to be sold worldwide in 2028, but Korea classifies GEO as GMO, so both domestic cultivation and sales are banned.

Professor Choi urged regulatory improvements, saying that if the GEO industry opens, a market worth tens of trillions of won will emerge in food and essential goods. He added, “The biggest victims right now are farmers” ….

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-3.54.04-PM
AI disinformation stress test: Challenges and response strategies
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-23-2026-09_20_20-PM
Kennedy’s CDC blocks publication of study that shows vaccines reduce hospitalizations by 50%, then misrepresents why
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-20-2026-11_17_18-AM-2
10,000 scientists gone: Trump’s cuts create an unprecedented brain drain
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-04_31_20-PM
‘Irresponsible decision’? On mandatory military flu shots, Hegseth chooses ‘freedom’ over health
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-1.14.34-PM
Latest fevered, right-wing conspiracy: Fox, New York Post, and kooky GOP legislators push ‘Dead Scientists’ scare
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-11-2026-11_58_46-AM
The Trump administration has run out more than 4,000 National Institutes of Health employees. Here are the consequences
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-2-2026-03_22_54-PM
Why ‘support supplements’ for GLP-1 users are mostly a waste of money
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.