AI tools designed to combat misinformation may actually promote it

As online misinformation grows harder to detect, new artificial-intelligence tools promise to help us separate fact from fiction. But do they actually work?

Not really, according to Dorsaf Sallami. For her doctoral research at Universitรฉ de Montrรฉalโ€™s Department of Computer Science and Operations Research, she examined the limitations of AI  systems designed to detect fake news.

Her conclusion: these tools have significant flaws that their technical performance often masks.

โ€œCurrent AI systems for detecting fake news are built on a fundamental misconception,โ€ Sallami said. โ€œWhen AI flags content as false, it doesnโ€™t fact-check as a journalist would. It calculates probabilities based on its training data.โ€

In other words, these systems donโ€™t check the facts against reality. They only reflect what theyโ€™ve been shown, like a mirror, complete with all the biases and gaps in their training data.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Sallami points to another critical issue: the lack of consensus over what constitutes misinformation.

โ€œTo train a system to distinguish fact from fabrication, you have to feed it thousands of examples labeled true or false,โ€ she explained. โ€œFor simple tasks, like telling a cat from a dog, the labels arenโ€™t controversial. But when it comes to fake news, even experts disagree.โ€

Sallami calls this the โ€œground truth problem.โ€

This is an excerpt. Read the original post hereย 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

wuhan institute of virology main entrance
โ€‹โ€‹COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpointโ€”Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-11.57.12-AM
Viewpoint: Raw milk and the myth of safetyโ€”ProPublica exposes the growing anti-homogenization movement
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-2.52.05-PM
Activist organization accuses Trump of protecting methane-generating stripper wells to benefit billionaire and donor Jeffrey Hildebrandย 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot-2026-06-16-at-10.02.22-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Industrial foodโ€™ primerโ€”Challenging the dangerous delusions of the alternative food movement
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-18-2026-02_32_04-PM
Can illegal social media content be stopped before it goes viral? UK is going to try.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-03_07_27-PM
AAP v. Kennedy: While a court challenge grinds on, RFK Jr. quietly advances his anti-vaccine conspiracy agenda

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.