Are we edging closer to precisely, and safely, editing human embryos?

UK scientists support loosening restrictions limiting embryo research
Credit: Pixabay/ drkontogianniivf

On June 1, an international group of industry and academic collaborators, led by geneticist Dieter Egli at Columbia University, released a preprint on bioRxiv demonstrating the use of base editing in human embryos (2026, DOI: 10.64898/2026.05.30.728989).

Base editing, which allows for precise swapping of one nucleotide for another without creating destructive double-strand breaks in DNA, is an evolution of CRISPR gene editing technology.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Although the base editing didn’t result in aneuploidy, it still had significant off-target effects. The researchers observed editing at sites other than the gene of interest and cases of mosaic embryos, in which not all the cells in the embryo carry the gene edits. For those reasons, the authors argue, more work and ethics discussions are necessary before using genetically edited embryos for clinical in vitro fertilization (IVF).

[David] Barrett has a few blunt words to spare for those who see genetic editing of embryos just beyond the horizon: “Science is not ready for heritable human genome editing.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-17-2026-12_42_10-PM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr. is setting up a panel to compensate people who claim they were injured by a COVID vaccine–no proof needed 
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
reverse-aging
Rapamycin: Here’s the skinny on the anti-aging pill that increases the lifespan—of mice by 10%
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
vitamin k refuse genai
More and more babies are developing uncontrollable bleeding—linked directly to vaccine deniers' rejection of vitamin K shots
UK scientists support loosening restrictions limiting embryo research
Are we edging closer to precisely, and safely, editing human embryos?
Screenshot-2026-07-17-at-12.55.22-PM
Viewpoint: Is bagged salad a dangerous science experiment? Challenging an online misinformation campaign
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
ma art page image
‘It’s time to have a conversation’: Once adamantly opposed to human gene editing, UK’s The Guardian acknowledges likely benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-03_29_08-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the impact of the U.S. abandoning support for global health?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.