Is the longevity obsession a new form of ageism?

using genetics to reverse aging
Credit: Atlas Biomed

It wasn’t always like this. In the 1600s and 1700s, when people aged 65-plus made up just 2% of the total population, older people were revered, as detailed in sociologist and ageing expert Dr Deborah Carr’s 2023 book Aging in America. Fashionable people often aged themselves and lied about being older for social prestige.

After the American revolution, as industrialization made the need for “efficiency” greater and the number of older people increased, things shifted. The social standing of older Americans took a big hit as a new “youth culture” emerged.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Ageing well or poorly now seemed like a personal choice, rather than a natural outcome. Although ageing had never been fully welcome, it was now officially “bad” to get old. We started saying that visibly ageing people had “let themselves go” and buying books with titles like 1986’s How to Live Longer and Feel Better or 2010’s Stay Young, Stay Fit.

On its surface, there is nothing wrong with the concept of longevity. It’s perfectly reasonable to want to live as well as possible, for as long as possible. Occasionally, however, modern advocates often make it seem as though death is now optional. Anti-ageing gurus have turned themselves into modern alchemists, questing for the scientific elixir of eternal youth.

Cultural critic and Guardian columnist Jessica DeFino is suspicious of this framing too. “Longevity is just the latest word that we’re applying to regular old anti-ageing ideology,” she explained.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-26-2026-05_58_17-PM
Louisiana and Texas bring RFK,Jr.- MAHA-backed restrictions on dyes and other ‘controversial’ ingredients to eight states
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-26-2026-05_35_53-PM
FDA takes up peptide therapies as hype outpaces science
Screenshot-2026-07-07-at-12.55.44-PM
Viewpoint: Yes, we can adapt to a changing climate without devastating the environment and the economy
Screenshot-2026-07-23-at-11.58.47-AM
Viewpoint: ‘Thought police in the UK?’ Conservatives lash out at government report calling anti-LGBQT+ narratives ‘false and misleading’
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-11_33_49-AM
Viewpoint: High-dose resveratrol supplements to extend health and life? Don’t waste your money.
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-10-2026-09_42_12-AM-1
Peptides, patient autonomy, and the limits of medical freedom
IVF Rex
Poll: Younger people more open to using genetics to increase fertility and reduce chances of inherited diseases 
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.