Is the Defense Department gobbling up research dollars originally targeted for medical research?

The Trump administration wants to gut a core research unit of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), and Democrats in Congress say the real reason is to help the Pentagon pay its bills, as MedPage Today’s Joyce Frieden reports.

A two-page notice quietly posted to the Federal Register on Aug. 28 proposes what the National Institutes of Health calls a reorganization of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: abolishing several offices along with the Division of Clinical Research (DCR), which oversees NIAID’s intramural clinical trials, regulatory compliance, and research methodology. The agency, in a notice signed by Acting Director John Powers III, MD, said the reorganization “aims to better align with presidential priorities and to reflect the institute’s updated vision and revised mission focus while continuing important research.” Public comment was open for just five days, Sept. 14-18.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The timing raised alarms on Capitol Hill. Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) revealed that the Department of Defense has struck an interagency agreement — never proactively disclosed to Congress — to tap NIAID funding for its own budget. “The Trump administration is now trying to rob NIH of billions of dollars that Congress provided for medical research so that it can pad the Pentagon’s budget,” Murray said, calling the arrangement “outrageous” and demanding it be terminated immediately. Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) said the money had been appropriated for research “intended to help Americans who are exposed to HIV, influenza, tuberculosis, and other deadly diseases.”

The Infectious Diseases Society of America and HIV Medicine Association jointly objected to the rushed process. HIVMA Chair Anna Person, MD, told MedPage Today the groups’ “concerns are focused on the process being used to rapidly advance a reorganization that involves abolishing the division and centers within NIAID,” warning that NIH should instead be prioritizing the “stabilization” of research infrastructure after a year and a half of upheaval. NIAID did not respond to requests for comment.

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-14-at-11.45.36-AM
Viewpoint: RFK Jr.’s stacked FDA advisory council endorses multicancer screening test from ethically- questionable company that would increase false positives and waste billions of dollars
Screenshot-2026-10-08-at-10.41.33-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness patches: Most vitamin supplements are useless and sometimes even dangerous, but this craze is even worse
newborn baby spit up gerd
Vaccine-preventable congenital infections are a leading driver of autism
Open-Menthol-Cigarette-Pack
How the tobacco industry conspired with conservative activists to kill the Biden administration’s proposed ban on menthol cigarettes 
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.