CRISPR-based drugs face tricky manufacturing problem

2-3-2019 df b aeb d bf crispr
Image credit: Bryan Satalino

There are two key challenges in delivering a CRISPR-Cas9 therapy so it is effective in the body: It must be delivered to a specific tissue, and it must also be delivered to the cells within that tissue.

As the gene-editing community focuses on the extraordinary promise of editing somatic cells to address profound unmet medical needs and its potential for alleviating human suffering, we also need to solve the more prosaic problems of delivery and manufacturing.

Companies that advance to clinical trials will require a much larger quantity of experimental drugs. Two manufacturing questions face these companies: If we started our manufacturing program in house, should we continue down that road and build our own manufacturing facility? If we started with a contract manufacturing organization, should we continue working with it or bring manufacturing in-house and build our own facility?

The right answer is tricky enough to qualify as a business school case study. Building manufacturing capacity is frighteningly expensive. And it won’t be ready for three to five years after you’ve made the decision to green light the project. So making the right decision requires an extraordinary amount of capital, foresight, and luck.

Read full, original post: CRISPR-Cas9 commercialization may be slowed by delivery and manufacturing challenges

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-02_53_56-PM
Embryo gene editing is on the horizon, stirring mixed emotions
a-mature-farmer-working-in-the-field-at-sunrise-harvesting-crops-generated-by-ai-photo
What’s the prospect of developing gene-altered crops that are more nutritious and resist climate disruption
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
png-upside-food-syn-bio-cultured-meat
Regulating cultured meat around the world
Screenshot-2026-07-21-at-6.22.06-PM
The Indian physician’s one-woman battle against health disinformation on Wikipedia
YearReview Grift
Viewpoint: A practical guide to evaluating social media wellness hype
reverse-aging
Rapamycin: Here’s the skinny on the anti-aging pill that increases the lifespan—of mice by 10%
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-03_29_08-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the impact of the U.S. abandoning support for global health?
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-17-2026-12_42_10-PM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr. is setting up a panel to compensate people who claim they were injured by a COVID vaccine–no proof needed 
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.