Viewpoint: Why Francis Collins is a bad choice to head the NIH

Credit: Stephen Voss
Credit: Stephen Voss
[I]n his eight years in charge of federal efforts to understand, diagnose and cure disease, current NIH Director Francis Collins has systematically underminedย the effectiveness of the institution and overseen a decline of American science.

Biomedical research in the US has been driven by the creativity and industryย of individual investigators and their trainees. Collins has systematically diverted funds from investigator-initiated projects in favor of โ€œbig scienceโ€ย projects conceived inย and managed from inside the Beltway.

The model for these initiatives is the well-regarded Human Genome Project. However Collins, who headed this project in its final years, learned all the wrong lessons from this effort, focusing on central planning and control, and the generation of massive datasets, while ignoring the importance of technology development. Hence his signature projects as NIH director have been ill-conceived and wasteful of precious research funds.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The National Institutes of Health areย an invaluable resource for the American people and our economy. But it is in serious need of reform if we are to benefit optimally fromย the opportunities of 21st century biomedicine. Itโ€™s time to replace Francis Collins and nameย a talented physician scientist with real vision and wisdom as NIH Director.

Read the original post

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-13-2026-11_51_39-AM
Viewpoint: COVID lab leak? Misguided backers of the lab leak theory refuse to give up
drug look like ozempic
Six key health insights from taking weight-loss drugs
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: โ€œTurn on, tune in, drop outโ€โ€”Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-14-2026-09_41_44-AM-2
Viewpointโ€”โ€˜The gleeful efficiency of an arsonistโ€™: Administrationโ€™s health and science research cuts are โ€˜sabotagingโ€™ Americaโ€™s future
Screenshot-2026-06-14-at-9.14.26-AM
โ€˜Humanitarian catastropheโ€™: Trumpโ€™s USAID shutdown could help drive nearly 23 million deaths โ€” including 5.4 million children โ€” by 2030, Lancet study warns
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
Screenshot-2026-06-14-at-9.53.54-AM
Is the World Cup a perfect storm for the spread of infectious diseases?
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT Image Jun 12, 2026, 02_32_14 PM
โ€˜Have you asked your doctor?โ€™: AMA launches campaign to counter health misinformation
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.