Viewpoint: Why I voted ‘no’ on the recently-approved ALS drug Relyvrio

Credit: Everyday Health
Credit: Everyday Health

In March and September 2022, I served on an FDA Advisory Committee reviewing the application of Amylyx Pharmaceuticals for the novel drug AMX0035 for patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

I voted against approval of this drug at both meetings, first as part of a 6-4 majority and then with the minority in a 7-2 vote.

On September 29, the FDA announced approval of the drug, which now has the brand name Relyvrio. I still believe that approval should have been deferred, pending the results of a large phase III study currently underway in Europe.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

The phase II trial on which the application for FDA approval of AMX0035 was based had a number of shortcomings, including:

  1. An error that led to the first 27 participants not being randomized (the first 18 received the active agent, and the next 9 were given placebo to compensate)
  2. Gastrointestinal side effects with the active agent that may have led to unblinding (although a survey at the end of the study did not show this)
  3. Thirteen participants started treatment with edaravone (Radicava), a recently approved ALS drug, during the course of the trial
  4. Historical controls (some dating from the 1990s when standard care for ALS was considerably different) were included in the statistical analysis
  5. The primary endpoint, the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R), does not have a well-established minimal clinically important difference based on patient experience
  6. The statistical analysis assumed linearity of ALSFRS-R change, which does not fit the data
  7. Post-hoc statistical re-analysis was included in the application for approval

For all these reasons, I feel the AMX0035 phase II trial did not show substantial evidence of efficacy.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-10_17_15-AM
Viewpoint: Why are the less intelligent more likely to be conservative—and smarter people more socially liberal?
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
Screenshot-2026-08-19-at-6.19.42-PM
Facts & Fallacies podcast: 'Regenerative farming'? RFK Jr.’s federal push romanticizes the past and risks food security
Screenshot-2026-08-12-at-11.31.46-AM
AI is helping develop new vaccines
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-28-2026-03_33_46-PM
Viewpoint: Bad science—Five bogus Trump administration claims about vaccines and autism
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-9-2026-02_48_24-PM
Viewpoint: Trump-RFK Jr. report on “Gender Ideology & Left-wing Ideology’ targets LGBTQ community—and science
Eating Nuts Adds up to Longer Life x
For millions with peanut allergies, Nurtured Nuts’ CRISPR gene-edited peanuts could ease the fear of accidental exposure
Screenshot-2026-09-14-at-4.31.14-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the likely impact when the EPA loosens rules limiting methane pollution from oil and gas wells?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.