Snake oil? Are biologicals used by farmers to treat diseases, fend off pests and enhance soil health effective?

Credit: Farm Journal
Credit: Farm Journal
The aim of the European Seedย series on Myths, Fake News, Misinformation and Disinformation is to dive deeper, taking a closer look at a variety of seed related topics. This article looks at the myths surrounding biologicals.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Myth: Biologicals are โ€˜snake oilโ€™

Fact:ย This is a huge misconception that customers and companies had, which stems from the misunderstanding of biological products as a whole. It should not be forgotten that biological products typically are live organisms. And back in the day, such products didnโ€™t have the best genetics. On top of that, the delivery method that was used for biologicals were quite old-fashioned. Such delivery methods were not friendly to keeping the biological product alive. And so, 20-30 years ago, this led to inconsistent performances. Over the last 20 years, the biological treatment sector has vastly improved. Not only have delivery methods become better, but baseline genetics and our understanding of genetics has greatly improved.

Myth: Biologicals need to be applied multiple times

Fact:ย The notion that biologicals must be used repeatedly during the growing season to achieve optimal performance is a common fallacy. Do I need to apply my biological on the seed, in the furrow, and then continue to do so again over the top? is an often-asked question.

It is incorrect to believe that biologicals need to be applied multiple times. Numerous organisms in the field are endophytic, meaning they reside inside the plant. Additionally, when you use those organisms as a seed treatment, they successfully colonize both inside and outside of the plant. Long term, this implies that the farmer will receive a season-long reaction to that biological.

The fact that many of these species are endophytic has also allowed scientists to pinpoint the genetics as being host specific. By having an organism that lives inside the plant, environmental elements like soil type, pH, and the availability of nutrients in the soil are actually eliminated from consideration. It makes no difference whether the produce was grown in Country A or Country B. You get a more consistent result from year to year since the organisms are inside the plant.

Consistency and dependability are the key concepts throughout. While it may not have been a given 30 years ago, this is today a feature shared by many biological treatments. Letโ€™s start by educating people to refute the idea that biological sciences are unreliable.

Marcel Bruins is the Editorial Director of European Seed. Find Marcel on Twitter @mbruins123

A version of this article was originally posted at European Seed and is reposted here with permission. European Seed can be found on Twitter @EuropeSeed

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
โ€˜Science moves forward when people are willing to think differentlyโ€™: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-02_20_13-PM
How RFK, Jr.โ€™s false vaccine claims are holding up $600 million to fight diseases in poor countries
viva-la-vida-watermelons
Misinformation and climate change are endangering summer watermelons
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health โ€” or even kill you
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of โ€œprocessโ€: What science says about the โ€œdangersโ€™ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
Drinking lots of water can help reduce the effects of aging
Nanoplastics in drinking water: MAHA activists forge science-based bipartisan coalitionย 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpointโ€”โ€œMiracle moleculeโ€ debunked: Why acemannan supplements donโ€™t work
Screenshot-2026-05-04-at-12.54.32-PM
How Utah became the countryโ€™s supplement capitalย  โ€” and a haven for unregulated, ineffective and fake products
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustleโ€”Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.