‘Three parent babies’ aren’t new. Here is what science has accomplished so far

[E]ight babies have been born in the UK following an experimental form of IVF that involves DNA from three people.

…

But these eight babies aren’t the first “three-parent” children out there.

…

The first were reported back in the 1990s. Jacques Cohen … and his colleagues thought they might be able to treat some cases of infertility by injecting the mitochondria-containing cytoplasm of healthy eggs into eggs from the intended mother. 

Newer approaches to three-person IVF aim to include mtDNA from just the donor, completely bypassing the intended mother’s mtDNA. 

[John] Zhang took the nucleus of the woman’s egg and inserted it into a donor egg that had had its own nucleus removed—but still had its mitochondria-containing cytoplasm.

Related on the SLP

Call it what it is: Mitochondrial replacement does not a three-parent baby make Promising future of delayed fertility? Don’t count your (frozen) chickens

Viewpoint: Dubious environmental fears: Why the AI buildout is critical to America’s ecological future

Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 

Child-monitoring apps: When the cure is worse than the harm—and how the technology could be tweaked

…

Less than 1% of the boy’s mitochondria carried his mother’s mutation, so the procedure was deemed a success.

There was a fair bit of outrage from the scientific community, though. 

…

The newly announced UK births are only the latest “three-person IVF” babies. And while their births are being heralded as a success story for mitochondrial donation, the story isn’t quite so simple.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here