25 years ago, India approved GMO rice and was poised to be the developing world’s crop bioengineering innovator. What went awry?

Credit: Annadatha via CC-BY-2.0
Credit: Annadatha via CC-BY-2.0

In the early 2000s, India’s fields promised to become laboratories of the future. When genetically modified (GM) cotton was approved in 2002, the air was thick with possibility.

Few innovations have sparked as much debate globally as Golden Rice, engineered to produce beta-carotene, the precursor of Vitamin A. In countries like the Philippines, it was seen as a potential weapon against Vitamin A deficiency, which causes blindness in children.

India, too, has millions of children suffering from micronutrient deficiencies. Yet despite extensive trials, Golden Rice never saw the light of day in India.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The reasons behind India’s hesitation are layered and complex. At one level, it is about trust. Food in India is already viewed with suspicion. Consumers worry about pesticides, adulteration, artificial coloring.

To introduce something that carries the tag “genetically modified” was bound to trigger unease.

At another level, the paralysis is political. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee may recommend approvals, but the final word often rests with ministries wary of public backlash. … The result has been decades of regulatory freeze, where science says one thing but politics decides another.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-13-2026-11_51_39-AM
Viewpoint: COVID lab leak? Misguided backers of the lab leak theory refuse to give up
drug look like ozempic
Six key health insights from taking weight-loss drugs
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: “Turn on, tune in, drop out”—Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
Screenshot-2026-06-14-at-9.14.26-AM
‘Humanitarian catastrophe’: Trump’s USAID shutdown could help drive nearly 23 million deaths — including 5.4 million children — by 2030, Lancet study warns
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-14-2026-09_41_44-AM-2
Viewpoint—‘The gleeful efficiency of an arsonist’: Administration’s health and science research cuts are ‘sabotaging’ America’s future
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-14-at-9.53.54-AM
Is the World Cup a perfect storm for the spread of infectious diseases?
ChatGPT Image Jun 12, 2026, 02_32_14 PM
‘Have you asked your doctor?’: AMA launches campaign to counter health misinformation
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.