The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.
. . [A]nti-GMO alarmist Nassim Talebย withdrew from the debate with meย over GMO crops . .ย . The debate was arranged by theย Journal of Markets and Moralityย and Taleb backed out after he received and read my initial essay on the subject. Since that essay had been largely written in response to his red-herring-filled working paper,ย “The Precautionary Principle (with Application to the Genetic Modification of Organisms,” I decided to go ahead and publishย my debate essayย anyway atย Reason.
With his characteristic intellectual generosity Taleb responded with a tweet linking to a letter that he has apparently now emailed to the editor of the journal. Tweet:ย The reason we decided not to respond to this idiot.
This idiot is, of course, me. Anyway the tweet and letter is below.
Share this article
Just a few observations about Taleb’s letter. To the extent that elementary points were “rehashed” in my essay that was necessary because Taleb and his colleagues in their poorly done “working paper” had made such an elementary hash out of both the science and relevant policy arguments with respect to the safety of modern biotech crops.ย . . .
. . . .
. . .Taleb and his colleagues provide no evidence whatsoever in their working paper that current versions of biotech crops might cause global ecocide or human extinction. They assume ruin and then crank through some equations that they evidently believe proves the truth of what is ultimately just a tautology.
Read full, original post:ย Nassim Taleb Calls Me an ‘Idiot’ – You Decide Who Wins GMO Debate
