You can put lipstick on a pig (GE feeding study), but it still stinks

The following is an edited excerpt.

The tiny cadre of anti-biotechnology activists who reside in the scientific community are perverting science by publishing spurious findings intended to scare consumers, ratchet up regulations, and impede the cultivation and sale of genetically engineered crops. As we wrote here last September about French scientist Gilles-Eric Séralini, who had claimed that his research showed that the consumption of genetically engineered corn causes tumors in rats, “he has crossed the line from merely performing and reporting flawed experiments to committing gross scientific misconduct.”

There is another more recent example — a long-term study of pigs fed genetically engineered feed, by Judy Carman, a researcher at Flinders University in Adelaide, Australia, and head of an anti-genetic engineering “institute.”  In June Carman and co-authors published a paper in the obscure Journal of Organic Systems, which concluded that weanling pigs were harmed by consuming a diet containing GE soybeans and GE corn.

Related article:  GMO pigs study – more junk science

Read the full story here:You can put lipstick on a pig (study), but it still stinks

ADVERTISEMENT
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
GLP Podcasts
Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Do you know where biotech crops are grown in the world? This updated ISAAA infographics show where biotech crops were ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
Send this to a friend