Washington state I-522 GMO labeling measure headed for defeat

dt common streams StreamServer cls copy x
Mock-up of the label that would have been required if Washington's I-522 passed on November 5. Via Seattle Times.
(summary)

I-522 appeared headed for defeat, with incomplete returns showing 45 percent in favor to 55 percent opposed according to the Washington state Secretary of State. The official web election site will be updated throughout the week as mail-in votes are received.

“This is a clear victory for Washington consumers, taxpayers and family farmers across our state,” Dana Bieber, spokeswoman for No on 522, said in a statement Tuesday evening. “Washington voters have soundly rejected this badly written and deceptive initiative.”

The measure, which would have been the first of its kind in the United States, required labeling of foods that are made with genetically altered crops as well as labeling of genetically engineered seeds and seed products sold in the state. The outcome was being closely watched around the country as more than two dozen U.S. states and the federal government wrestle with whether to require labeling.

Supporters of the measure, who say it would help consumers make informed shopping choices, have not yet conceded, pointing to ballots unaccounted for through the vote-by-mail system in the Pacific Northwest state. However, the number of mail-in votes are not believed to be large enough to change the final outcome.

Read the full, original story here: “Washington state GMO labeling measure headed for defeat — opponents” 

Additional Resources: 

 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.