Will public trust in personalized medicine suffer, an ethicist wonders

mg
Image via New Scientist.

In 2008, 23andMe’s suite of direct-to-consumer genetic testing services was named “Invention of the Year” by Time magazine.

Just five short years later, however, the FDA demanded that 23andMe stop selling its health-related tests pending scientific analysis, casting a huge shadow of doubt on the future of personal genetic testing. Will the challenges facing 23andMe also affect public trust in personalized medicine?

Doubts go back a long way. In 2008, the American Society for Clinical Oncology commissioned a report that concluded the partial type of analysis involved wasn’t clinically proven to be effective in cancer care. In 2010, the US Government Accountability Office concluded that “direct-to-consumer genetic tests [involve] misleading test results… further complicated by deceptive marketing”.

This is the root of the FDA’s concerns. In its letter to 23andMe, it raised the risk that customers could get false information that leads to drastic and misguided medical steps. 23andMe founder Anne Wojcicki now says: “We want to work with [the FDA], and we will work with them.” But is it too little, too late?

While the most consciously populist genetic testing service wrestles with its critics in the months ahead, there is a growing danger that wider public acceptance of personalised medicine in the clinical setting may also suffer in the fallout from 23andMe’s woes.

Read the full, original article: Testing times for the consumer genetics revolution

Additional Resources:

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend