GMO DEBATE RECAP: Battle over Biotechnology—Public backs GM research and farming

Screen Shot at AM

I was really excited to watch the Intelligence Squared debate. I’ve been looking forward to it for seemingly ages.

Bottom line—it was as predicted. Fear, questions, and magical thinking against science, reason and evidence. And science won. Not only did science win, the fear-based empty fact-free claims from the other side are permanently stored online for everyone to enjoy forever.

[Intelligence Squared has posted a video recording of the debate]

[Genetic Literacy Project has a report on how leading anti-GMO groups, including Greenpeace and GMO Free USA, are already turning on their own, accusing debate scientists Margaret Mellon and Charles Benbrook, who were soundly trounced in the debate, over being paid Monsanto shills.]

According to votes recorded on the Intelligence Squared website, the motion in support of agricultural biotechnology prevailed over those opposed to it by a convincing 60-30 percent.Battle Over Biotech Final Score

I’m not going into too much post-event analysis, but I will take the time to point out some of the major things we all need to take note of.

Mellon has no clue. She seems to think that Europe is this wonderful place that has ag all figured out. Of course, they import massive amounts of food from the USA, Brazil and Argentina because they are not self sustaining!  Here’s a nice article by Steve Savage on those not-European-food eaters.

The Bingo card got a good beating! I think I did hear Benbrook say “antibiotic resistance” and we came close on Starlink! bingocard

Most importantly the results show what we know. Most people that are undecided will gravitate toward science when they are offered facts over fear.

Read full, original article: Thank God It’s On the Internet FOREVER

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claims? The evidence says mostly the opposite
ChatGPT-Image-May-13-2026-11_56_08-AM
After slashing global health aid by $19 Billion, Trump moves to tap $2.1 billion more—to cover shutdown costs
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
png-pill-omega-Supp-fish-oil
Millions take omega-3 fish oil for brain health. New research suggests it may do the opposite.
Screenshot-2026-02-20-at-10.48.04-AM
Deepfakes raise profound ethical questions in science
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-01_41_42-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Measles is a canary in the healthcare coal mine’: Challenging RFK, Jr.’s scare campaign
donut-decorated-with-e-food-additives-tablets
RFK, Jr. is targeting chemical food additives. What does science tell us?
Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 12.34
Viewpoint: RFK Jr. recommends replacing ‘poisonous’ seed oils with beef tallow. The American Heart Association says that could eventually kill you.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.