New EU GMO approval system could open door to Britain, other countries approving more GE crops

a eu networkeurope

You could call it a victory for common sense. The European Parliament is expected to confirm an astonishing departure from Brussels’s usual insistence on uniformity, and allow member states to make up their own minds on a vital, controversial issue.

The extraordinary development, described as “liberating” by some experts – but attacked by others as “undermining” the single market – aims to break a 15-year deadlock in growing GM crops. For all that time, an unbridgeable chasm between pro-GM and anti-GM countries has prevented Brussels from approving any new modified varieties for cultivation, even when they have passed the European Commission’s own scientific assessments.

Just one – a Monsanto GM maize, authorised in 1998 before the stalemate struck – is grown, mainly in Spain and Portugal. Other pro-GM governments, the UK and the Netherlands, would like to see many more varieties approved and growing in their soils. But they have been frustrated by determined opponents of the technology – France, Germany, Luxembourg and Austria – who have blocked the qualified majority required in Brussels to give the go-ahead.

Now, after four years of tricky negotiations, a partial solution is in sight. Due to be rubber stamped by the parliament on Tuesday, it will allow anti-GM nations to ban the modified crops from their territories outright. The hope, and expectation, is that – reassured they will remain free of them – they will stop blocking approvals and thus allow those that want to grow them to proceed.

Read full, original article: The EU might finally be close to a grand bargain on GM crops

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The Orange Bowl without oranges: Can CRISPR save Florida citrus?
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot 2026-05-22 at 11.31
‘Realistic and durable’: EPA proposes loosening restrictions on some PFAS ‘forever chemicals.’
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 12_06_53 PM
Fake Ebola cure promoters already cashing in as disinformation videos flood social media
ChatGPT Image May 24, 2026, 03_16_36 PM
Here come the biohackers' Enhanced Games—The Olympics for athletes doping up on steroids, hormones and peptides. What’s wrong with that?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.