Public engagement in science matters key to solving ethical dilemmas

The need for researchers to escape the lab or the seminar room from time to time, and talk to the wider public about the work that they do, and why it matters, is now such an established feature of the academic landscape that it’s easy to forget how far and fast we’ve travelled.

From the paternalistic if well-intended talk of “public understanding” of science in the 1980s, through the bumps and scrapes of battles over GM foods, climate change, bees and badgers, we’ve reached a point where the diversity, volume and intensity of conversations between researchers and the public – at schools, festivals and in pubs; on blogs and twitter; on TV, radio and YouTube – is one of the standout strengths of UK science. The launch earlier this week of an open access database of almost 7000 case studies, developed by universities for the Research Excellence Framework, provides another treasure trove of examples of creative ways researchers are engaging new audiences and having an impact on the world.

Over the past decade, the UK has also become a testbed for novel and more structured approaches to public dialogue on science and technology. Back in 2004, one of the quietly radical initiatives in Gordon Brown’s 10-Year framework for science was the creation of the Sciencewise programme, to support public dialogue on policy issues involving science and technology.

Read full, original article: Let’s keep talking: why public dialogue on science and technology matters more than ever

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-02_36_39-PM
Viewpoint: After firing the entire National Science Board, Trump reshapes funding initiatives. Here’s the good and the bad.
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
sorghum farmers in kenya FARMERS TREND
Here are all the ways CRISPR gene editing is transforming Africa’s staple crops—and there’s a lot more innovation to come
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-10-2026-10_36_07-AM
Viewpoint: Even lousy scientific articles can shield authors when they hype dubious health claims and products
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-30-2026-01_38_36-PM
Viewpoint: Died “with measles” vs. died “from measles”: RFK, Jr.’s dangerously subversive word games
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-30-2026-01_25_34-PM
Blood tests for Alzheimer’s? The latest grifter, social media scam.
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-03_15_09-PM
Viewpoint: Chipotle-inspired lesson: 10,000 sick customers suggest that processed foods can be safer than fresh ones
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.