Fetal DNA test highly accurate in detecting Down syndrome

A Roche blood test to screen fetuses for Down syndrome worked far better than standard prenatal screening tests in younger, low-risk women, U.S. researchers said, setting the stage for more widespread use.

The new study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, is the largest to show the tests are accurate in even low-risk women. But experts warned that women who test positive still need to confirm the result through more invasive diagnostic testing such as amniocentesis, especially if they would consider terminating a pregnancy.

“This is a great test for detecting Down syndrome but it doesn’t detect everything, it isn’t diagnostic, and it doesn’t always work to provide a result,” said Dr. Mary Norton of the University of California, San Francisco.

Prior studies have shown such fetal DNA tests, which measure DNA fragments from the placenta circulating in the mother’s blood, are highly accurate at detecting Down syndrome and two other chromosomal abnormalities in high-risk women, typically those over the age of 35.

Several physicians’ organizations have supported use of the newer cell free fetal DNA tests over the standard screening in older, high-risk women.

Read full, original article: Fetal DNA tests prove highly accurate but experts warn of exceptions

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-2.36.47-PM
Is organic farming really more sustainable? 100 recent studies say ‘no’
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-11.13.59-AM
RFK Jr.’s plan to curb America’s appetite for ultra-processed foods and artificial dyes blocked by the White House
Screenshot-2026-10-07-at-10.15.18-AM
Hooked on kratom: The unregulated, natural, alcohol-free “social tonic” that is destroying lives 
Radioactive-Americana-Collage-2
The kooky logic behind the raft of spurious cancer claims from Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-11.26.17-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness movement activists reposition nicotine from a killer addictive drug into a cure-all for brain ills
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-10.54.12-AM
‘They misunderstand science’: Research attempting to tie autism to changes in the gut microbiome comes under fire
Supreme-Court-Amid-Climate-Crisis
Should fossil fuel companies be shielded from lawsuits over climate change damage? The Supreme Court takes up the question
Resolute-Portrait-with-Injured-Teddy-Bear
Anti-vax Texas Senate candidate Ken Paxton alleges conspiracy by doctors, drugmakers, and insurers to push childhood vaccination for profit
Childrens-Health-Defense-Press-Briefing
Court links patient’s death to anti-vaccine doctor promoted by Kennedy’s Children’s Health Defense
Kind-People-Kind-Futures-Hands
Patches for sleep, weight, NAD+, energy, focus, periods. No evidence to support the latest social media wellness scams
strand of dna genetics
No, GMO foods do not “damage genes, natural disposition and hormones, or decrease physical health and intelligence”
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.