Monsanto helped cover legal costs of Australian GM lawsuit

Global agribusiness Monsanto contributed to a West Australian farmer’s legal costs in a battle over alleged contamination of his neighbour’s organic crop, the company has confirmed.

Steve Marsh took his neighbour Michael Baxter to court over alleged contamination of his canola crop in 2010 by GM seeds from Baxter’s property.

In May last year, the WA Supreme Court threw out Mr Marsh’s claim and awarded Mr Baxter more than $800,000 in legal costs.

However Mr Marsh appealed against the decision, and last month the Supreme Court ordered Baxter to disclose any financial help he received from Monsanto and the Pastoralists and Graziers Association.

In a statement, Monsanto said the legal dispute had been difficult for the families and communities involved.

“It was only fair that the Baxters received much needed support given the extensive fundraising efforts of Steve Marsh’s supporters,” according to the statement attributed to Monsanto Australia’s Managing Director Daniel Kruithoff.

“Monsanto Australia contributed to the Baxters’ legal costs to ensure they could defend themselves in court.”

Monsanto’s support was limited to contributing to legal costs, and the company had no control over the management of the case, the statement said.

Kruithoff refused to reveal how much money the company had contributed towards Baxter’s legal costs so far, but said its financial support would be ongoing during the appeals process.

Read full, original article: Monsanto contributed to WA farmer Michael Baxter’s legal costs in GM case

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jun-21-2026-02_33_08-PM
Texas Air Force base flu outbreak soars to over 220 cases, and one soldier has died after Secretary Hegseth scrapped mandatory military flu shots 
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-15-2026-11_51_00-AM-4
Viewpoint: As the International Association for Research on Cancer loses influence, activists and trial lawyers scramble to protect a lucrative playbook
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
screenshot pm
Which is better for building healthy farm soil? Organic offers no special edge.
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-9-2026-01_11_37-PM
Turmeric supplements: More risks than benefits
wuhan institute of virology main entrance
​​COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-13-2026-11_51_39-AM
Viewpoint: COVID lab leak? Misguided backers of the lab leak theory refuse to give up
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-05_21_35-PM
The American Medical Association doctors declare war on RFK, Jr.’s attack on safe vaccines
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpoint—Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
Screenshot-2026-06-19-at-4.53.19-PM
Viewpoint: How the Trump administration is thwarting the will of Congress and starving American science
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-9.44.03-AM
Viewpoint: Embryos are becoming the newest battleground of love, loss, and legal uncertainty
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.