Direct-to-consumer genetics makes people less sure of what they know about genetics

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

After reading a comprehensive report on their own personal genome, consumers reported knowing less about genetics than they did before.

Wait, what? How could that be?

You’ve heard of people getting a genetic test for a specific condition – parents-to-be seeing whether they are carriers for inherited conditions. Personal genomic testing goes much further than that. Instead of looking for one or a few specific genetic markers, the test results include a huge array of genetic variants which may range from the simple and trivial (can I curl my tongue?) to the complex and serious (do I have an elevated risk of heart disease?).

Personal genomic tests might be ordered through a health care professional — but not necessarily. There’s also direct-to-consumer (DTC) personal genomic testing, in which the consumer places an order with a private company, sends in a sample of their DNA (a bit of saliva or blood), and receives their results directly from the company.

As part of the ongoing Impact of Personal Genomics Study, new customers of DTC genomic testing companies agreed to complete surveys about their experiences. Among other things, we asked them to rate their own understanding of genetics and genetic testing

Which brings us to the plot twist. After receiving their direct-to-consumer genomic test results, the participants as a whole were quite a bit less confident in their understanding of genetics. In fact, it wasn’t even close.

Read full, original post: Genomic Testing Makes Consumers Less Confident in Understanding Genetics (And That’s Probably Okay)

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Prescription Capsules Scattered on Twenty-Dollar Bills
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it, Part 2
MAHA-MOMS-Supporters-at-the-Rally
Viewpoint: How 'MAHA men' hijacked the female-built food and wellness movement
Dissolving-Tablets-in-Waves
Viewpoint: How the anti-abortion movement twists medical facts and promotes science misinformation
Executive-Greeting-in-a-Futuristic-Boardroom
Viewpoint: RFK Jr. touts AI to guide health care…but searches using the technology he champions expose him as scientifically illiterate
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
Deepfake Democracy Media Mosaic
31 states have passed a patchwork of laws to limit election deepfake commercials. They’re not working very well.
Personalized-Cancer-mRNA-Vaccine-Vial
Personalized mRNA vaccines are poised to revolutionize cancer treatments. Here are the barriers.
Golden Wheat Under a Starry Sky
Viewpoint: ‘Bureaucratic and economic obstacles’ to agricultural biotechnology: Europe creeps into the 21st century, but blocks remain
Caution-Taped-Fresh-Produce-Aisle
Should we be afraid of our food?
Cross and Syringe Standoff
Viewpoint: Hijacking Jesus: How anti-vaccine fanatics are exploiting religious exemptions and killing children
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-10.54.12-AM
‘They misunderstand science’: Research attempting to tie autism to changes in the gut microbiome comes under fire
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-12.26.15-PM
‘Forever chemical’ concerns: Separating hysteria from reasonable concern in the debate over PFAS danger
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.