Should we be afraid of our food?

America’s food-safety system hasn’t kept pace with an increasingly industrial, globe-spanning food supply, and recent staffing and budget cuts are widening the gap, argues Eric Schlosser, author of Fast Food Nation, in The Atlantic.

The cyclosporiasis outbreak linked to contaminated iceberg lettuce has hit at least 48 states, with roughly 17,000 lab-confirmed cases. But cyclospora is relatively mild, Schlosser notes, compared with Salmonella, which sickens more than 1 million Americans a year, or botulism.

Botulism is the more alarming story. At least 48 infants across 17 states were hospitalized after consuming ByHeart powdered formula, and at least four more fell ill from Nara Organics formula. Both likely shared a culprit: milk powder from one Nevada plant, made with raw milk from 55 California dairies and shipped as far as Germany and Denmark before reaching U.S. shelves. “Nobody has ever fed babies this kind of stuff before,” Schlosser writes.

Oversight is fragmented. A frozen cheese pizza falls under the FDA, while a meat-heavy one belongs to the USDA, and the U.S. is the only developed country that splits food safety among separate agencies. Meanwhile, the USDA lost about a fifth of its workforce in 2025, and the number of pathogens tracked by the CDC’s FoodNet surveillance program has been cut by 75 percent.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Fixes exist. A 2013 “test and hold” rule for E. coli in ground beef, championed by George Washington University professor Barbara Kowalcyk after her son died, has made beef-linked outbreaks rare. Denmark cut Salmonella in broiler chickens from 14 to 0.3 percent. Yet after a 2022 Consumer Reports investigation found Salmonella in nearly a third of U.S. ground chicken, the USDA withdrew a proposed poultry rule, citing “significant financial and operational burdens on American businesses and consumers.”

In 1906, a food executive told Congress, “We are paying all we care to pay.” That remains the industry’s response today, Schlosser argues. “It’s the rest of us who bear the cost.”

Read the original article here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Prescription Capsules Scattered on Twenty-Dollar Bills
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it, Part 2
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Screenshot 2026-10-27 at 10.32
“Do your own research”: What Medicare’s annual open enrollment circus teaches us about the seductive trap of DIY health and science
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.