Institute of Art and Ideas: The culture-genetics conundrum

CroppedImage After Evolution credit to skulls for invitepack
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

From criminality to the love of gossip, many biologists argue that behavior is rooted in our genes. Yet every culture comes with its own set of behaviours, and behavioral differences can often lead to conflict, indicating that the roots of human tendencies are not always shared. So if cultural variation is not explained by evolution, where does it come from? In a recent debate, Institute of Art and Ideas (IAI) TV (UK) explores possible answers to this question, as well as ways in which our ancestral past may shape our future.

In After Evolution: Is Culture Beyond Genetics host Julian Baggini is joined by evolutionary psychologist Oliver Scott Curry, anthropologist Daniel Everett and philosopher Janet Radcliffe-Richards as they grapple with the idea that we may have greatly overestimated the impact of our genes. Curry proposes that our brains are hard-wired to be “flexible,” which explains cultural diversity. Everett contends that evolutionary psychology should not be prioritized over cultural psychology, while Radcliffe Richards argues that we can use evolutionary theory to start asking new questions about culture.

Might culture be beyond the limits of biological explanation? The decision is currently yours, but After Evolution provides insights into the phenomenon of cultural diversity from three very different and very powerful perspectives.

Read full, original post: Philosophy for our times: cutting edge debates and talks from the world’s leading thinkers

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend