Effectiveness of bipolar disorder treatment may depend on patient’s genes

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

A group of international scientists investigated how a patient’s genetic make-up could impact the effects of the drug lithium, which is used to treat mood disorders including bipolar and depression.

Despite being the most effective bipolar treatment available, the study found that lithium only works for about a third of the people who take it.

University of New South Wales’ head of psychiatry Philip Mitchell, one of the co-authors of the study, said they had found that while one third of patients did partially well, one third did not respond at all.

“Bipolar disorder is a very difficult condition to treat,” he said.

“It’s very disruptive and also over time, it’s recurrent, so people have repeated episodes of manic highs and depressed lows which really damage people’s lives.

“The imperative is to stop those episodes recurring. When you get the treatment correct though, it can just make an enormous difference to people’s lives.”

The study, published in the Lancet journal, was a collaboration between researchers all over the world from the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics.

The researchers concluded that different genetic markers may determine how well patients respond to the lithium.

“There’s been growing evidence that the response to lithium appears to run in families, which has suggested that there are probably genetic determinants of who benefits from lithium,” Professor Mitchell said.

Read full, original post: Bipolar treatment: Genetics change people’s response to lithium, study finds

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1-5
Science Disinformation Gap: The transatlantic battle over social media and censorship
Screenshot-2026-04-23-at-11.00.36-AM
Regulators' dilemma: Thalidomide, Metformin, and the cost of getting drug approvals wrong
ChatGPT Image May 10, 2026, 08_16_59 PM 2
Overmedicalization? RFK Jr.’s antidepressant crackdown raises conflict questions over his fee stake in Wisner Baum, the tort firm built on suing drug makers
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-08_39_41-PM
GLP podcast: Big Pharma, Big Ag, Big Food—health harming industries or life-saving innovators?
Screenshot-2026-05-12-at-9.58.31-PM
'He seems fine': Marty Makary out as FDA commissioner
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
Screenshot-2026-05-12-at-10.05.11-AM
Pro-vaccine “hero” vs. an anti-vax “villain”: ‘Bad Vaxx’ video stirs MAHA backlash
Screenshot-2026-05-11-104424
Hantavirus outbreak research: Trump administration shut down study last year on rodent-to-human transmission
Screenshot 2026-05-11 at 11.30
Despite politicized disinformation, Midwest AI data centers are fueling a solar energy boom
ChatGPT Image May 12, 2026, 10_19_00 AM 2
Viewpoint— 'Muscular governance': How authoritarianism is surging corporate-linked energy misinformation
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.