The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.
More than a decade after leading geneticists argued that race is not a true biological category, many studies continue to use it, harming scientific understanding and possiblyย patients, researchers argued in a provocative essay in Science.
โWe thought that after the Human Genome Project, with [its leaders] saying itโs time to move beyond race as a biological marker, we would have done that,โ said Michael Yudell, a professor in the Dornsife School of Public Health at Drexel University and coauthor of the Science paper calling on journals and researchers to stop using race as a category in genetics studies. โYet here we are, and there is evidence things have actually gotten worse in the genomic age.โ
Categorizing someone as โblackโ can affect medical care, research hasย shown. Doctors might miss cystic fibrosis in โblackโ patients because it is considered a โwhiteโ disease,ย a 2015 studyย suggested. Similarly, because blood disorders called thalassemias are considered a Mediterranean/white disease and sickle-cell anemia a black disease, they are sometimes misdiagnosed when they strike the โwrongโ racial group, Yudell and his colleagues wrote.
Share this article
The reason scientists still use race as a way to group people โ asking, for instance, which genetic variants are more common in this or that race โ is that many still consider the concept useful if imperfect, said geneticist Neil Risch of the University of California, San Francisco, and president of the American Society of Human Genetics.
Read full, original post:ย Should biologists stop grouping us by race?
