Agriculture Secretary Vilsack answers questions about GMO labeling

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

In a brief interview, Vilsack. . .ย lamented the debate that’s divided the farming community. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Were you disappointed the bill stalled inย the Senate?

I’m disappointed because I think it’s an opportunity at this point in time to bring agriculture together as opposed to continuing this dispute within agriculture.

. . . .And I’m hoping that despite the setback that folks in the Senate don’t stop working on this issue and figure out a way to reach common ground.

Do you think that’s realistic before July 1, before Vermont’s law goes into effect?

I think it’s certainly possible and doable if people. . .are willing to understand that they’re not going to get everything they want.

. . . .

And you see consumers scanning a QR code on a product with their phones as a possible compromise?

That’s certainly not the only way it should be done. . . .There should be an understanding that’s easier for a larger company than a smaller company. . .ย . There’s a process the industry would have to go through and frankly they should have done this 20 years ago. But they didn’t, so now they’re playing catch-up.

. . . .ย Is there a need for moreย USDAย funding into research into these issues so people can trust that the research isn’t tainted or influenced by industry?

. . .[T]his administration has believed all along there needs to be more publicly financed research.

. . . .

My budget is less today than it was when I first became secretary. It’s because agriculture doesn’t have the public understanding. . .But you can’t have that if you’re fussing and fighting within agriculture about labels or about production methods. You’ve got to unify

Read full, original post:ย GMO labeling: 5 questions with Ag Secretary Tom Vilsack

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-13-2026-02_20_22-PM
Viewpoint: Misinformation infodemic? Why assessing evidence is so challengingย 
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDAโ€™s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
bigstock opioids on chalkboard with rol
GLP podcast: 'Safe injection sites': enabling drug addiction or saving lives?
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformationโ€”about farming
circular-bioeconomy-should-focus-on-sustainable-wellbeing
GLP podcast: What's wrong with 'doomsday' environmentalism? It's false.

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.