Chicago Tribune: ‘Basic’ GMO label will not help consumers make informed purchases

Picture

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

[…]

On Tuesday, the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine released a long-anticipated study that clarified two major points:

•Genetically engineered crops are no more of a health risk to humans than conventionally bred crops are.

•The insect and weed resistance that has evolved through their use is a “major agricultural problem.”

ADVERTISEMENT
[…]

It ends with a chapter on the regulation of genetically engineered crops. And it recommends, in effect, that we stop confusing the process (genetic engineering) with the product (say, a corn tortilla).

“All technologies for improving plant genetics — whether genetic engineering or conventional — can change foods in ways that could raise safety issues,” the report counsels.

In the U.S. and Europe, activists have turned “GMO” into a dirty acronym, and some states are moving forward with laws that will require foods with GMOs to be labeled. The first of its kind takes effect July 1 in Vermont. Without more complete information about a food’s origins or the process through which it was grown, we don’t see how a basic “GMO” label will help consumers make truly informed purchases.

Read full, original post: Some answers — and more questions — about GMOs

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
GLP Podcasts
Infographic: Deaths from COVID-19 are far higher than reported estimates

Infographic: Deaths from COVID-19 are far higher than reported estimates

More than 2.8 million people have lost their lives due to the pandemic, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend