Should scientific community embrace germ line gene therapy?

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Until now, only one approach — somatic cell human gene therapy (SHGT) — has been viable. But another approach — “germ line gene therapy” (GLGT), which, by modifying sperm, eggs, or embryos, creates a heritable change that affects future generations — is now also approaching practicability.

In May 2016, Chinese researchers published the results of a partly successful attempt to edit genes using nonviable embryos that were going to be discarded. The experiment precipitated a firestorm in the scientific community, with some researchers and bioethicists calling for an absolute ban on attempts to treat even imminently lethal diseases with gene-editing techniques that would affect germ cells.

However, not only does GLGT not require the manipulation of normal embryos, it may not even demand the manipulation of abnormal embryos. And perhaps the most important point in the debate is that GLGT can save lives.

People must not be afraid to move forward. If we do not take the first step, we will never reach our goal. When that goal is saving lives, standing in place is unjustifiable.

Read full, original post: In defence of germ line gene therapy

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Genetics Unzipped
Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Infographic: How dangerous COVID mutant strains develop

Sometime in 2019, probably in China, SARS CoV-2 figured out a way to interact with a specific "spike" on the ...

Philip Njemanze: Leading African anti-GMO activist claims Gates Foundation destroying Nigeria

Nigerian anti-GMO activist, physician, and inventor pushes anti-gay and anti-GMO ...

Most Popular

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend