To test or not to test? When is genetic screening for diseases a smart move?

Screen Shot at AM

Hundreds of prescription genetic tests are now available for every­thing from depression to cancer to Alzheimer’s disease. Such testing does hold promise, says David Flannery, M.D., medical director of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. But he cautions that widespread genetic testing is still unwarranted. ….

Heart Disease

For familial hypercholesterolemia, testing can make sense if you have a family history of high cholesterol and an LDL reading of more than 190 mg/dL confirmed on two occasions…[If] testing reveals cardiomyopathy, it’s wise to have an electrocardiogram and echocardiogram every three to five years, depending on your age…[However,] nix testing if you have no family history of either [familial hypercholesterolemia or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy].

Breast Cancer

Testing might be useful if you have a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer, or a relative known to have a BRCA variant, or if you have an Ashkenazi Jewish heritage plus a close relative with breast or ovarian cancer…Say no if you don’t have a strong family history of breast cancer.

Alzheimer’s

One genetic test screens for an early-onset form of the disease, another for a gene, APOE, that increases the risk of developing it later in life…[But you should skip the test since] early-onset Alzheimer’s accounts for less than 1 percent of dementia cases. And the test for the APOE gene isn’t very accurate….

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Some genetic tests are worthwhile, some are not

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-07-09-at-1.09.25-PM
Anti-vaccine myths rattle health care
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2026-07-28 at 3.22
Hidden hunger: Climate change is speeding up the decline of important nutrients in our food
Screenshot 2026-07-22 at 1.38
Viewpoint: Are the U.S. and Europe headed towards a repudiation of agricultural biotechnology red tape?
Screenshot 2026-07-28 at 3.03
What is cyberchondria?
Screenshot 2026-07-28 at 2.04
Viewpoint: How AI supercharges conspiracy theories and oversimplifications to distort online health information
organic scaled
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Organic food cuts pesticide exposure? A response to Dr. Rhonda Patrick
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-11_51_01-AM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s depressingly misguided (and litigator-funded) crusade against antidepressants
png-terrace-Farm-asia
Europe’s tentative embrace of agricultural gene editing could revolutionize food production and health in Asia
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-11_33_49-AM
Viewpoint: High-dose resveratrol supplements to extend health and life? Don’t waste your money.
Screenshot-2026-07-27-at-3.23.14-PM
Prioritizing AI, robotics, and nuclear energy: Trump administration is guiding research funding away from independent universities to private companies
Screenshot 2026-07-28 at 3.43
Fat cat? GLP-1 weight loss drugs for animals are on the horizon
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.