Cornell’s Tony Shelton: Scientist behind GMO moth in activist crosshairs

Tony Shelton
Prof.Tony Shelton, who spearheaded the research for the GMO moths, faces intense opposition due to GMO fears

[Cornell University Professor Tony Shelton] admits to being disappointed by the “misinformation” directed at his research to find a non-insecticidal control for the diamond-backed moth (DBM).

…

Biotechnology is a hot-button issue, and Shelton knows that addressing public concerns comes with that territory.He has been doing outreach for the past three years, creating an informational website, delivering lectures and hosting a 2015 public forum. Even so, neither he nor Cornell seemed to anticipate that the first open release of genetically engineered self-limiting insects in America would become such a big story.

The [public forum hosted in Geneva, NY] was yet another attempt at engagement, attracting a smaller crowd than expected, and fewer foes… [Shelton] recognizes that some of them are worried about how GE insects could affect their organic certification, but he says the legal precedents don’t support their fear.

Still, the process generated a flurry of controversy that made clear Shelton’s opponents suffered from some grave misperceptions about his research.  Part of the problem stems from ideological blinders that prompt many activists to dismiss any GMO work out of hand, regardless of the details. But some of it was due to lack of resources and time — and the inherent difficulty of communicating science to the public.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Cornell’s sustainable pest control pioneer weathers storm over GMO moth experiment

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
Screenshot-2026-09-03-at-10.51.20-AM
Viewpoint: Why do online health lies outlive the evidence that debunks them? Read "Everyone Else Is Lying to You"
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-01_52_03-PM
Viewpoint: 4 very real AI doomsday scenarios
Screenshot-2026-09-23-at-3.15.09-PM
Anti-GMO activists in Pakistan rev up their campaign of dire warnings
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-11.40.28-AM
After Idaho criminalized abortion providers in 2022, one-third of obstetricians fled. Health care advocates are making rural health the case for repealing the ban
Screenshot-2026-09-23-at-11.55.01-AM
How can we know if social media bans actually help teens?
Screenshot-2026-09-10-at-12.20.19-PM
'Jet fuel didn't melt the steel': 9/11 conspiracy theories debunked
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-26-2026-12_46_16-PM
Viewpoint: The fake controversy over whether combining childhood vaccines is dangerous— a debate science resolved 25 years ago
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-10_32_46-AM
There has been a slew of recent reports of food recalls and foodborne outbreaks. Do we face an escalating problem?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.