Do cell phones cause cancer? Long-awaited study offers mixed results, no definitive answer

texting mn e bbe e d bd a eb a focal x

The long-awaited results ofย a $25 million National Institutes of Healthย study on the effects of cellphone radio-frequency radiation exposureย on animals is out, and the results are mixed. They showed a higher risk of tumors, DNA or tissue damage, and lower body weight in some groups of rodents, butย no obviousย ill effect inย others and no clear implications for human health.

โ€ฆ

The new NIH study showed tumors in rats and mice inย other parts of the body โ€” the brain, prostate, liver and pancreas โ€” but the scientists said it was unclear whether those were related to the radiation.

Theย experiment involvedย placing rats and mice into special chambersย and exposing them to levels of radiation that mimic 2G and 3G phones, which were standard when the study was launched, for nine hours a day.

Researchers said that they found some tissue and DNA issues but that โ€œwe donโ€™t feel sufficient understanding to comment on their biological significance.โ€

โ€ฆ

The Food and Drug Administration, which commissioned the study, released a statement describing โ€œtheย mostly equivocal, or ambiguous, evidence that whole body radio-frequency energy exposures given to rats or mice in the study actually caused cancer in these animals.โ€

Read full, original post:ย Cellphone radiation study finds mixed effects in rodents, without clear implications for human health

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
โ€˜Science moves forward when people are willing to think differentlyโ€™: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of howย  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health โ€” or even kill you
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.