USDA data confirm organic yields significantly lower than with conventional farming

organic farm big

The productivity of organic farming is typically lower than that of comparable โ€œconventionalโ€ farms. This difference is sometimesย debated, but a USDA survey of organic agriculture demonstrates that commercial organic in the U.S. has a significant yield gap.

I compared 2014 survey data from organic growersย with overall agricultural yield statistics for that year on a crop by crop, state by state basis. The picture that emerges is clearโ€“organic yields are mostly lower. To have raised all U.S. crops as organic in 2014ย would have required farming of one hundred nineย million more acres of land. That isย an area equivalent to all the parkland and wildlandย areas in the lower 48 states or 1.8 times as much as all the urban land in the nation. As of 2014 the reported acreage of organic cropland only represented 0.44ย percentย of the total, but if organic were to expand significantly, its lower land-use-efficiency would become problematic. This is one of several reasons to question the assertionย that organic farming is better for the environment.

The USDA conducted a detailed survey of organicsย in 2008 and then again in 2014. Information is collected about the number of farms, the acres of crops harvested, the production from those acres, and the value of what is sold. The USDA also collects similar data every year for agriculture in general and makes it very accessible via Quick Stats. It is interesting that they donโ€™t publish any comparisons of these two data sets as they would be able to make comparisons on a county basis. By working with both USDA data resources I was able to find 370 good comparisons of organic and total data for the same crop in the same stateย and where the organic represented at least 20 acres. That comparison set covers 80ย percentย of U.S. crop acreage.

Summary of the comparison of organic and conventional statistics for 2014
Summary of the comparison of organic and conventional statistics for 2014 (click image to enlarge)

For 292 of those comparisons, the organic yields were lower (84ย percentย on an area basis). There were 55 comparisons where organic yield was higher, but 89ย percentย of the higher yielding organic examplesย involved hay and silage crops rather than food crops. The organic yield gap is predominant for row crops, fruit crops and vegetables as can be seen in the graphs below.

The reasons for the gap vary with crop and geography. In some cases the issue is the ability to meet periods of peak nutrient demand using only organic sources. The issue can be competition from weeds because herbicides are generally lacking for organic. In some cases its reflects higher yield loss to diseases and insects. Although organic farmers definitely use pesticides, the restriction to natural options can leave crops vulnerable to damage.ย Iโ€™ve posted a much more detailed summary of this information on SCRIBD with the data at the state level.

Organic yields are substantially lower for many major row crops
Organic yields are substantially lower for many major row crops
Organic fruit and nut yields are mostly substantially lower than conventional
Organic fruit and nut yields are mostly substantially lower than conventional
Yield gaps vary widely among vegetable crops
Yield gaps vary widely among vegetable crops

There is some potential for artifacts within this data set. If the proportion of irrigated and non-irrigated land differs between organic and conventional that would skew the data. With lettuce and spinach it is likely that the organic is proportionally more in the โ€œbabyโ€ category making yields appear dramatically lower. But overall this window on farming is useful for understanding the current state of commercial organic production. Since the supply of prime farmland is finite, and water is in short supply in places like California, resource-use-efficiency is an issue even at the current scale of organic (1.5 million cropland acres, 3.6 million including pasture and rangeland).

You are welcome to comment here and/or to email me at [email protected]. Iโ€™d be happy to share a data file with interested parties and to get feedback about where particular yield comparisons might be misleading.ย A moreย detailed presentationย is available here.

This article originally appeared at Forbes as “The Lower Productivity Of Organic Farming: A New Analysis And Its Big Implications” and has been republished here with permission.

Steve Savage is an agricultural scientist (plant pathology) whoย has worked for Colorado State University, DuPont (fungicide development), Mycogen (biocontrol development), and for the past 13 years as an independent consultant. His blogging website isย Applied Mythology. You can follow him on Twitter @grapedoc

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot-2026-05-28-at-1.36.28-PM
Viewpoint: Can mRNA research survive the Trump administration?
ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_21_36 AM
Limiting gender affirming interventions: Trump administration targets Texas even though it already bans youth access
Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 3.45
Viewpointโ€”GMOs and sustainability: Why buying organic foods is the least environmentally-sensitive food choiceโ€”without offering any health benefits
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-11_39_58-AM
Viewpoint: Who is RFK, Jr.โ€™s newly-appointed CDC senior counselor, Sara Brenner โ€” Vaccine skeptic and self-proclaimed โ€œMAHA momโ€
Screenshot-2026-06-02-at-11.59.11-AM
Magnifica Humanitas: Popeโ€™s encyclical broadside against AI naivete and overreach
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile โ€˜thought experimentโ€™
Screenshot-2026-04-14-at-11.11.06-AM
โ€˜Turbo cancerโ€™ or mRNA cancer cure? Strategies to counter misinformation
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-2-2026-03_04_17-PM
Viewpoint: Why the hyper-promoted doping โ€˜enhanced gamesโ€™ pseudo Olympics flopped
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.