The [New Zealand] Environmental Protection Authority is shrugging off criticism of its processes by a group of mainly Wellington scientists.
Writing in the latest edition of the New Zealand Medical Journal, the scientists argued the authority used unsound methodology in its comments on the herbicide Glyphosate, which is used in many weedkillers including Roundup.
…
In a statement, the Environmental Protection Authority said the article contained very little new information, and relied significantly on media references and opinion.
It acknowledged public concern around glyphosate, but said as a scientific organisation its decisions must be based on evidence and data.
Share this article
“EPA’s decision-making processes are more extensive and complex than implied in the commentary. The Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act requires us to follow a set process when considering chemicals for reassessment, which is costly.
“The process ensures we spend taxpayers’ money wisely, and that we address those chemicals which present the biggest threat to human health and our environment, in priority order,” the statement said.
The authority added glyphosate was on a watchlist, but other chemicals remained more dangerous.
Read full, original post: EPA rebuts scientists’ call for herbicide ban
